Queen Wintergreen - Alice Fulton

I’m not exactly sure how we ended up in their kitchen. Perhaps we were brought there, just a few doors down from my father’s apartment, by one of the twin sisters who happened to be watching my sister and me for the afternoon. 

Philadelphia summers are hot, but their kitchen was spotless and cool. I remember it feeling shiny. There was a porcelain plate with a picture of the Pope on it above the small table that was placed along a wall where we sat. I remember glancing at it several times during our visit. I don’t know how long we were there. But I do remember the voice of the twins’ mother. I had only heard a sound similar to it in movies or on television. I recognized English words, but he accent turned her sentences into a song made up of foreign-sounding syllables. I recall my father saying that their family was Irish…only Irish lived on that side of the street (Italians lived on the other side of the street). I noticed that the twins, when they spoke with their mother, their voice changed. It too took on the rhythm of a song. I remember how pretty I thought the twins were, and now, the songs that they “spoke” enhanced their beauty. 

Queen Wintergreen dredged up this memory…one that may have lasted only a few moments, from more than 40 years ago. Irish accents emerged from the pages. Sing-songy sentences uttered in an Irish-American kitchen decades ago found their way out of my memories and married themselves to Fulton’s story. 

Silent Passengers - Larry Woiwode

A portion of the final sentence in this story, placed there perfectly by Woiwode, wrapping up all the story’s words placed into a perfectly concise bullet shot directly into that spot in your mind holding memories, blasting it back into your active consciousness…directly connecting you with…” them”. 

“--- all of them suspended for a second against the horizon, silent in the wind.”

You’ve witnessed the scene - I’ve witnessed it -  “Them,” of course, in the sentence can be swapped out to fit your recalled scene, but for many of us, after reading this story, the “them” are our children. 

It took less than 5 minutes into reading this story for my mind to drift back to reading and rereading the David Foster Wallace story Incarnations of Burned Children. The story shook me, and I shared my feelings with a coworker during discussions of life as new parents, as well as our mutual admiration of DFW. 

This is another story where the point in life when you encounter it is so important. It does what great fiction does: offer an alternative perspective, placing you into the mind of another. But, as I’ve written about before, if I encountered this story at the age of 20, it perhaps might have impacted me differently. Even at the ages that my kids are at now, I know that if I come across this story again in a few years, my experiences would surely color its re-read. 

Once again, I’ll pull a quote from the author featured in the anthology’s Contributor’s Notes 

“I used to say (and so used to think, I would hope, that if fiction had a salubrious effect, that was secondary. Art, you know, art. But after living through many different sorts of responses over the years to my work, and especially to this particular story, I'm not so sure about that.

Isn't it important for fiction to bring about moments of stasis, of restoration — of healing, if you will? It was largely people who underwent some such experience who responded to "Silent Passengers" by writing to me.”

I was happy to encounter Larry Woiwode again. Incredibly, the last time I read him was 16 years ago. 

Change - read in February 2010

First Born - read in June 2010

Reviewing my writing from 16 years ago, how his stories impacted me at that point in my life…man, it’s staggering how much the world and (selfishly) my life have changed. 

I suppose that’s all a part of living, though. 

Larry Woiwode died in 2022. 

The picture of Woiwode at the top of this post is from 1976. I think he looks badass. 

A Real Life - Alice Munro

First published in The New Yorker, February 3, 1992

I read a very persuasive (obviously)  opinion piece this morning in The New York Times that brought me back to this page. In short, it helped me recognize or perhaps remember one of the reasons or benefits of this whole blog/exercise. I’ve been writing on other platforms recently about the importance of being a human, and human creativity and cultivating all things human as AI moves with greater intensity into our lives. As a quick aside, as I’m typing this out, Grammarly and Gemini are underlining in red, yellow, and dotted lines the mistakes in grammar I’m making and suggestions for improvement on my phrasing. I began this blog before these tools were available, and I’ll admit to using them as they became available, but I think I’ll refrain from their use as I can now see the value of my human errors in the final product…these entries.

Above, I used the word exercise to describe the reading and writing here. I believe I’ve used that word in the past, and after my reading this morning, I feel stronger about the use of this word in developing my humanness…and the value of this extends beyond the stories in BASS and the words I type here. I believe, I came to realize after several months of reading and writing here back in 2008 and 2009, that unconsciously, I started this blog for my benefit. That fits the pattern since I consider myself a selfish person…overcoming my selfishness is a lifelong struggle that I’m working on…and recognize. But, through this reading and writing, I see that I have, (when I actually read and write), broken down those weak muscles and made them stronger. And now, after this morning's reading, I can see the HUMAN necessity to read and write. And as I insert the above sentences before a major portion of this post (I originally began the post with the paragraph beginning “I really have no concrete recollection…” below), I am rereading some of my writing and seeing how circular some of my thoughts are, and I’m good with that because it’s me working through my thoughts. 

And how ironic, glancing up again at the title of the story that I am placing all these thoughts under. Perhaps it’s equally as interesting that this is happening with the association of one of, if not the most difficult authors, I encounter in the BASS. 

It’s a hard exercise session, and one filled with reflection and a chance to assess my shortcomings.              

I really have no concrete recollection of purposely skipping them over, and I now, with the realization that I have, feel somewhat ashamed. Wrote several times about my struggles with the writings of Munro, and even with this post, I am finding difficulty in getting the words onto the screen, as I finished the story several months ago…maybe even sometime in 2025, and this issue is a giant speed bump in my posting here. As I was searching for previous posts where I reviewed Munro’s stories, I discovered that I had outright skipped over writing about her last two stories.

Carried Away - 1992 

Friend of My Youth - 1991

Again, I have absolutely no recollection of making the conscious decision to omit these stories…and now, I feel the obligation to make things right by submitting thoughts about these two. 

Here are my entries on the others. 

Wigtime - 1990

Differently - 1990

Spelling - 1979

Wood - 1981

Monsieur Les Deux Chapeaux - 1986

Circle of Prayer - 1987

Meneseteung - 1989

While searching for my posts, I came across this comment on a Munro post where, unsurprisingly, I was writing about my struggles with her stories. 

 

“Maybe you just don't fully appreciate Alice Munro's writings---their beauty, grace, and subtlety. The strength of her stories lies in their quiet messages and nuanced meanings. She rarely makes her stories conspicuously understood on initial reading, and sometimes a second and much more careful reading is necessary to get down to what she intends primarily to convey in the scenes and situations she writes about.”

I appreciate the time the anonymous commenter took to send me this message; they are absolutely right, and I am actively working to improve my reading of these collected authors… including Munro. 

But as I work on this entry, which is taking longer than I hoped, I have found myself breaking an early practice of this journal. I don’t know/remember if I have ever set it into writing - the actual process of reading and writing here- but a basic idea of this practice was to read one story and write about it immediately after completion. This worked for several years, but I have found that I have moved away from this process and jumped ahead in my reading and left the writing behind. 

This seems to be a fundamental break in what I was hoping to accomplish with this exercise - but at the same time, I have noticed that the often written-about “state” of encountering a story at a certain time, then rereading it and interpreting it differently the second time due to changes in your life, is happening quite a bit.

The Girl on the Plane - Mary Gaitskill

 

I think I’m on my third version of this post, which, as one would expect, has taken on the flavor of the time in which it was written. It would be so much easier if I were able to write about the story immediately following reading it, and that is the goal, but we are where we are in this project, and I’ll be playing a little catch-up. As it stands now, I’m writing about the second story in the anthology and reading the twelfth. 

Write faster, man! 

Mary Gaitskill is one hell of a writer, and after reading about her, she’s one hell of a person, too. Fearless, bold, and looking over my shoulder, back at the early 90s, she fits perfectly into that new decade. I was going to opine on the story, “The Girl on the Plane”,  but there are so many others that have provided thoughts from every conceivable angle that I thought I’d focus more on a few words Mary wrote in the anthology's Contributors’ Notes - always a rich source, for additional insights into the author’s mind and story.

Just a brief brush against the story. I’m reading this story in 2026, and the world is a much different place than it was 34 years ago. The story today stirs different emotions in the reader than it did in 1992/1993; our collective tolerance of certain behaviors, perhaps, has gone through some societal psychotherapy, not to excuse the behavior, but perhaps it has uncovered and brought forth the raw, honest interior of humans.

“The Girl on the Plane” is a story about a conversation, the dynamics between men and women, and finally, perception from and of: the characters, the author, and the readers, illustrating that we need to own that perception and it’s our responsibility to consider the impact of our behaviors, which we seldom do.  

Here is a passage from the Contributors' Notes.  

“I don't see how people can be responsible for their behavior if they are not responsible for their own thoughts and feelings. In my opinion, most of us have not been taught how to be responsible for our thoughts and feelings. I see this strongly in the widespread tendency to read books and stories as if they exist to confirm how we are supposed to be, think, and feel. I'm not talking wacky political correctness, I'm talking main-stream. And not just written stories either; I was flabbergasted by the public debate over the film Thelma and Louise, in which grown people discussed a Hollywood movie as if its purpose was to instruct us on how to live our lives, condemning or praising it based on whether they thought the instructions were valid. (I would not be surprised if some of these same people also wrote essays bemoaning "victimism.") Ladies and gentlemen, please. Stop asking "What am I supposed to feel?" Why would an adult look to me or to any other writer to tell him or her what to feel? You're not supposed to feel anything. You feel what you feel.

Where you go with it is your responsibility. If a writer chooses to aggressively let you know what he or she feels, where you go with it is still your responsibility.”

I would love to see Gaitskills' notes or thoughts about this story before publication - just to see how the passage of time, post publication, influenced the above, if at all. 

Two portions that I’d like to highlight. 

“In my opinion, most of us have not been taught how to be responsible for our thoughts and feelings.”

And 

“You feel what you feel.

Where you go with it is your responsibility.” 

Wise words.